If you are looking for EIA UK, it's overhere.

Thirty Years Since the International Ivory Ban, Say Goodbye to Ivory Hanko

By Allan Thornton, President, Environmental Investigation Agency US

This opinion originally appeared in Japanese in Asahi Shimbun on January 8th, 2020

Around 20,000 elephants have been killed every year in Africa, for the past decade at least, to supply the global trade in ivory. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) decided to end international ivory trade in 1989. This year marks thirty years since the ban entered into effect, on January 18, 1990. Still, why does the poaching continue?

Although the international trade was banned, many countries continued to allow domestic trade in ivory. Because of this, attempts to pass off illegally imported ivory, derived from poached elephants, as having been obtained in a legal way domestically have prevailed. Consequently, poaching problems have never gone away. Then CITES Parties adopted a resolution calling for countries with domestic ivory markets linked to poaching or illegal trade to urgently close them. Around this time, major consumer nations including the United States and China banned or undertook bans on domestic trade in ivory to protect elephants; subsequently, Japan has become the world’s largest domestic ivory market remaining today. The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), has analyzed the official import statistics and calculated that Japan has imported tusks from some 328,000 elephants since 1950, mainly to produce ivory hanko.

Judging from both past and current circumstances, Japan should urgently close its domestic ivory market. However, the Government of Japan and the hanko industry, responsible for consuming 80% of raw ivory for hanko production, have bent over backwards to defend the market.

Responding to such situations, critical movements have taken place at home and abroad. Domestically, online retailers including Rakuten, Mercari, and Yahoo! Japan have banned elephant ivory product sales. AEON and Ito-Yokado will ban ivory sales in March 2020.

Internationally, thirty-two African nations urged Japan to close its domestic ivory market at the CITES meeting last year. The New York Mayor and thirty-seven US congresspersons sent letters to Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike and the Japanese Embassy in Washington, respectively, requesting Japan ban domestic ivory sales as well. In those letters, they expressed grave concerns that legal domestic sales could cause American people visiting Japan during the Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics to misunderstand that they could bring ivory products bought in Japan back to the United States, when in fact they would face the seizure of those items by US customs.

Confronting realities – such as rapid popularization of electronic signatures and exemption of hanko notification in incorporation procedures in the near future – the hanko industry is striving to develop a new market targeting foreign visitors. Why instead don’t they gain an international reputation for Japan’s hanko by ending ivory sales? Japanese consumers have the opportunity to push the industry policy change by saying no to ivory, and choosing other materials. I would like to continue to act for the sake of Africa’s elephants, together with Japanese people.

Now, the hanko industry must consider the damaging impact of the continuing resistance to the CITES resolution urging bans on domestic ivory trade. Why doesn’t the industry try to achieve a positive international reputation of “Japanese hanko” by discarding ivory hanko? Japanese consumers can pressure the industry to change its policy by selecting alternative materials for hanko, and saying “no” to ivory. I’m grateful to work together with Japanese people to protect elephants.

View all Blog Posts

Recent Blog Posts

Still Waiting for Action: Tokyo's Ivory Trade Assessment
08/11/2021
The reality of the scope and impact of COVID-19 hit home for much of the world when the Tokyo 2020 Games were postponed. A year later and looking far different than ever expected or hoped, the Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games finally arrived. As the host of the 2020 Games, Tokyo has come under increased scrutiny for its legal market for elephant ivory. Even as the Games were underway, the influential capital city faced mounting international pressure to close its legal ivory market for good. For World Elephant Day 2021, in between the Tokyo 2020 Olympics and Paralympics, we take a look at where Tokyo stands in doing its part to protect the world's elephants from the threats of ivory trade and poaching. 
End of an Era: Yahoo! Japan Ceases Ivory Sales
11/13/2019
End of an Era: Yahoo! Japan Ceases Ivory Sales

Recent Reports

Letter: NGOs Make Recommendations for Tokyo Ivory Market Closure
10/07/2021
EIA and 30 international non-government environmental and conservation organizations sent a letter October 7, 2021, following up on previous appeals to the Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG). Our organizations continue to urge Tokyo to close the market for elephant ivory and make specific recommendations in the letter to the TMG for moving forward. The letter can be viewed in English and Japanese.
Letter: NGO Appeal to the Tokyo Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games
06/25/2021
: EIA, JTEF, and HSI appeal to the Tokyo 2020 Organising Committee President and Governor of Tokyo to take action to prevent illegal trade and export of elephant ivory products

Recent Press Releases

Tokyo Fumbles Short-Term Ivory Trade Action
06/25/2021
Conservation, environmental and animal welfare groups bemoaned measures announced today by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government to address Tokyo’s illegal ivory trade as a missed opportunity. Tokyo’s short-term plan is focused only on consumer awareness and falls dramatically short of expectations for substantive action, instead replicating previous failed awareness efforts by Japan’s national government.
Japanese Retailers Willing to Sell Ivory Hanko for Illegal Export
12/17/2020
Investigations of Japanese hanko retailers revealed that many are willing to sell an ivory product knowing that it will be exported internationally despite most being aware that ivory export is illegal.