If you are looking for EIA UK, it's overhere.

Peru Promotes Oil Palm Expansion Despite Devastating Consequences for Indigenous Peoples & Amazon

Despite reports about the devastating impacts of oil palm expansion on forests and indigenous peoples, the Peruvian government continues to promote oil palm development, supposedly as a viable economic alternative in the fight against drug trafficking, migratory agriculture, and poverty.

Recently, the government announced the creation of the Multisectoral Commission on Oil Palm, which will consist of representatives from the palm industry and government officials. No civil society or indigenous groups have been invited to participate in the commission, essentially excluding the voice of the people most affected by oil palm expansion in the Peruvian Amazon.

In response to the Commission’s creation, 29 Peruvian civil society organizations, including EIA and Aidesep (the Interethnic Association for the Development of the Peruvian Amazon), sent a letter to the government of Peru demanding that the Multisectoral Commission on Oil Palm include the participation of relevant stakeholders, including indigenous groups, NGOs, and academics—all with expertise and a stake in development of the Amazon region and forest protection.*

Amazon forests consumed by oil palm

Oil palm is currently cultivated on 77,537 hectares of land in the regions of San Martin, Ucayali, Loreto and Huánuco, and is slated to expand exponentially, despite the recent statement by the Government Accountability Office of Peru that oil palm is the main driver of deforestation. In Loreto alone, the annual production of palm has increased by 115 percent, causing this region to have the highest rate of forest loss per year in the Peruvian Amazon. This oil palm cultivation is responsible for the destruction of 30,206 hectares of forest, equivalent to 29 percent of total annual deforestation in the country.

A sign of what’s to come: Melka Group illegally deforests 5,000 ha in Ucayali

Alongside the ongoing promotion of oil palm, the National Ombudsman, Eduardo Vega Luna, has requested the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of the Environment suspend all permits authorizing companies to plant oil palm in Ucayali. This request comes in response to a complaint raised by the community of Santa Clara of Uchunya against palm oil company Plantaciones de Ucayali—part of the Melka Group exposed in EIA’s report Deforestation by Definition—for operating illegally on 5,000 hectares of forestland without an approved environmental management plan. Obtaining environmental certification is one of the first legal requirements in the process of obtaining authorization to develop a plantation.

Aidesep Declaration of Regulatory Emergency on Oil Palm

Following these developments, Aidesep, released a Declaration of Regulatory Emergency on Oil Palm (English translation here) with the support of its nine regional federations. The resolution calls on the government of Peru to suspend all land transfers to large oil palm plantations until all conflicting regulations regarding land use are modified, and until it is guaranteed that no more primary forest will be cut down in the Amazon. Aidesep makes this demand, arguing that the ongoing land seizure by agribusiness for agro-industrial palm plantations violates Peruvian national law, the rights of thousands of indigenous people, and international agreements such as Peru’s Letter of Intent for zero net deforestation signed with Norway and Germany in 2014.

One conflict with the ongoing authorization of palm production is the Ministry of Agriculture’s (MINAGRI) failure to yet define parameters for the Best Land Use Capacity for Agriculture (BLUC) in natural forests, which is required to determine land best suitable for planting oil palm. As long as these lands remain unclassified by MINAGRI, palm oil companies will be able to use the land use classification process to gain authorization for the development over forests. According to Aidesep, there are currently 11 requests for the transfer of large oil palm concessions in Loreto, Ucayali, and San Martin that amount to 99,356 hectares. If these transfers are approved, deforestation would increase by 88 percent. Alongside these land transfer requests, 1,200 requests for land title by indigenous people for 20 million hectares remain unresolved by the government.

The directive council of Aidesep also stated in its declaration, “Our forests and territories cannot continue to be destroyed, first without anybody saying anything and second because no clear rule exists that regulates or controls in an effective manner this palm activity.”

Action must be taken by Peru’s government to prevent the destruction of the Amazon, as its forests are rapidly being claimed by palm oil companies under the auspice of development. Further, disregard of indigenous peoples’ voice, and the forests they depend upon, not only violates national and international law (such as ILO Convention No.169), but also discredits commitments made by Peru to protect forests and decrease carbon emissions, such as the Peru-Norway-Germany Letter of Intent for zero net deforestation, the New York Declaration on Forests, Peru’s Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) before the UNFCCC COP 21, and commitments made before the Forest Investment Fund and UN-REDD, among others.

** The letter notes that while inclusion of multiple stakeholders in the Multisectoral Commission on Oil Palm is critical, participation does not replace free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) with indigenous people regarding oil palm projects, as required by national law and international agreements.*

View all Blog Posts

Recent Blog Posts

Mukulagate
09/16/2021
While the coronavirus pandemic rages on, ravaging Zambia’s economy and crippling its citizens' lives, new findings by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) show that illegal exploitation and trade in mukula (Pterocarpus tinctorius) persists unabated, benefitting a small number of well-connected and wealthy individuals. A probing undercover investigation into illegal mukula logging and trade sheds light on the apparent theft of more than 10,000 trees and unveils information connecting the Zambia Agency For Persons With Disabilities (ZAPD), the Ministry of Community and Social Services, the Ministry of Tourism and Arts, and the office of the vice president. Nearly two years after EIA’s exposé on the institutional looting of Zambian forests, it appears that the more things have changed with the pandemic, when it comes to mukula, the more they’ve stayed the same.
Respaldo de Sociedad Civil a Defensora Ambiental en Perú
03/26/2021
60 instituciones y miembros de la sociedad civil y organizaciones indígenas en Perú emitieron hoy un comunicado respaldando a la Defensora Ambiental Lucila Pautrat ante los ataques que viene recibiendo de parte de una empresa investigada por la instalación no autorizada de monocultivos agroindustriales en Tamshiyacu, en la Amazonía peruana.

Recent Reports

Tainted Beef
05/27/2021
A new report by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) reveals how beef sold in Colombian supermarkets is fueling illegal deforestation in protected Amazon forests and contributing to financing armed groups.
Carne Contaminada
05/27/2021
Un nuevo informe de la Agencia de Investigación Ambiental (EIA por sus siglas en inglés) revela cómo la carne que se vende en los supermercados colombianos está alimentando la deforestación ilegal en los bosques amazónicos protegidos y contribuyendo al financiamiento de grupos armados.

Recent Press Releases

US Company Pleads Guilty to Importing Illegal Timber from Peru
09/23/2021
US Company pleads guilty to importing illegal timber from Peru
The Lie Behind the Ply
06/30/2021
European Consumers of Tropical Plywood have been the Unwitting Drivers of Threatened Forest Degradation
Follow us @eiaenvironment on twitter for the latest updates!