If you are looking for EIA UK, it's overhere.

World Bank Attempting to Sabotage Reform of CDM HFC-23 Projects

WASHINGTON, D.C. / LONDON - In an effort to justify its participation in perhaps the biggest carbon market scandal to date, the World Bank has dismissed concerns that the UN Clean Development Mechanism's (CDM) HFC-23 projects are generating millions of fake carbon credits.

An analysis released today by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), Ethically Bankrupt: World Bank Defense of the HFC-23 Scandal (available at: http://www.eia-global.org/PDF/Report--EBBriefing26August2010.pdf) details the factual and analytical errors rife within the recently published World Bank Q & A on CDM HFC-23 projects.

Despite its role as the fiscal agent for distributing billions to combat global warming, the World Bank has defended the flawed program for destroying HFC-23 even as the Executive Board of the CDM launched a comprehensive investigation into the scandal and suspended issuance of credits from six of the projects, including one from the World Bank.

Despite its role as the fiscal agent for distributing billions to combat global warming, the World Bank has defended the flawed program for destroying HFC-23 even as the Executive Board of the CDM launched a comprehensive investigation into the scandal and suspended issuance of credits from six of the projects, including one from the World Bank.

"The World Bank can't be the solution to climate change until they stop being the problem", said Samuel LaBudde, Senior Atmospheric Campaigner with EIA who added, "Self-enrichment at the expense of climate mitigation is indefensible, as is paying chemical plants so much to destroy waste gas that they intentionally produce more."

Under the CDM, 19 projects that manufacture the refrigerant HCFC-22 are paid to capture and incinerate HFC-23 byproduct though issuance of Certified Emission Reductions Units (CERs) that are then sold on international carbon markets. An analysis of HFC-23 projects in the form of a Revision Request submitted by CDM-Watch (available at: https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/revisions/58215) to the UNFCCC in March, revealed evidence that some CDM plants are intentionally maximizing the amount of HFC-23 waste gas produced up to the level to which they receive CDM credits. This has likely resulted in the issuance of millions of fake carbon credits with no benefit to the climate, and huge subsidies to manufacturers resulting in higher production of super greenhouse gases.

Eva Filzmoser from CDM-Watch said: “We find it astonishing that the World Bank concludes there is not sufficient evidence to support our allegations, while the investigation by the Methodology Panel is still ongoing. There is a clear conflict of interest here.”

Manufacturers in China and India, where most of the HFC-23 projects are located, earn as much or more for destroying HFC-23 than they do for producing HCFC-22, which incentivizes production and use of HCFC-22 for the sole purpose of increasing the amount of HFC-23 created.

Last week in an unprecedented move, members of the Executive Board requested a review of the issuance of more than 9.5 million CERs from six HCFC-22 plants, requiring additional information from the plants to ensure the projects do not result in fake emissions offsets. CERs for HFC-23 destruction account for 51% of the almost 430 million CDM credits issued to date and are used extensively in carbon markets by the EU, Japan and other Kyoto Protocol Parties.

The World Bank’s Umbrella Carbon Facility invests in two of the largest HFC-23 incineration projects. In 2006 the Facility contracted to pay 775 million Euros/ (US $982 million) for almost 130 million CERs ($2,24 billion at current carbon market value) from two projects in China. Both projects were identified by the Revision Request as operating to generate the maximum amount of HFC-23 that could be credited, resulting in superfluous greenhouse gas emissions and fake carbon credits.

The World Bank Q & A argues against any changes in current crediting for HFC-23 projects and dismisses any and all evidence of wrongdoing. EIA's analysis reveals a number of serious factual errors in their Q & A and a clear avoidance of the larger issues. "The World Bank's position is both scientifically and morally indefensible", said Mark Roberts, Senior Policy and Legal Advisor for EIA. "It should stop trying to subvert the CDM investigation and allow the UN to do a job they are far better qualified for than the World Bank."


Mark Roberts: +(1) (617) 722-8222, markroberts@eia-international.org;
Samuel LaBudde +(1) (415) 632-7174, samlabudde@eia-international.org

Ethically Bankrupt: World Bank Defense of the HFC-23 Scandal and the HFC-23 Revision Request are available here
Environmental Investigation Agency
PO Box 53343, Washington, DC 20009 www.eia-global.org
Tel: +1 202 483 6621/ Fax: +1 202 986 8626

View all Press Releases

Recent Blog Posts

Unkept Promises: Chemours Newest Targets Miss the Mark
Following EIA’s call to cease irresponsible operations and subsequent mounting press pressure, the American chemical giant, the Chemours company released a new statement on their climate goals yesterday.
Major Climate Win: Lessons for the Montreal Protocol
Two new papers published in Nature suggest that the CFC-11 emissions are back on a downward trajectory potentially avoiding substantial delays in the recovery of the ozone layer. The papers show an accelerated decline in global atmospheric concentrations of CFC-11 from 2018 to 2019, and attribute 60% of the decline to China. This is a huge win for the ozone layer and our climate, which would not have been possible without a concerted global response to the findings from the ground and the atmosphere.

Recent Reports

EIA briefing to OEWG43: Unexpected CFC-11 emissions
Briefing to the 43rd Meeting of the Open-ended Working Group of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol (OEWG 43)
Template: Letter of Support for EIA AIM Act Petition
Interested organizations can submit a letter of support for EIA’s petition to EPA to restrict HFC uses under the AIM Act. Please download the attached template above to submit a letter to newberg.cindy@epa.gov.

Recent Press Releases

Landmark EPA Climate Rulemaking Takes Aim at U.S. Phasedown of Super-Pollutant HFCs
The Environmental Protection Agency has published a landmark new climate regulation to establish an allocation system to cap and begin phasing down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), the super pollutant greenhouse gases used mainly in cooling.
First-Ever Walmart Shareholder Resolution on Climate-Damaging Refrigerants Passes Key Threshold for Support
Today, Walmart investors voted on the first-ever shareholder resolution on refrigerants and their related climate impacts. The initial count indicates 5.5 percent of investors voted in favor of the proposal filed by Rhode Island Treasurer Seth Magaziner, urging Walmart to disclose how it will limit its impact on climate change by increasing the scale, pace, and rigor of its plans to significantly scale back hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) used in its operations.

Recent Videos

Leaking Havoc: Exposing Your Supermarket’s Invisible Climate Pollution
An EIA investigation into dozens of supermarkets in the greater Washington, D.C. area, including Virginia and Maryland, found a majority of stores to be leaking super-pollutant hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants
What are the HFC-free Technologies?
Widespread adoption of HFC-free technologies is cost-effective, energy efficient, and climate-friendly. Read EIA’s report Putting the Freeze on HFCs for hundreds of examples of HFC-free technologies available and in use today.
A Global HFC Phase-down
The October 2016 Montreal Protocol meeting in Kigali, Rwanda yielded a global agreement to phase down HFCs. Now countries must ratify and implement the Kigali Amendment! Read and share EIA's briefing on this great opportunity and obligation to avert climate catastrophe.
Help us mitigate climate destroying gases
Where are HFCs used?
What are HFCs?
How to Recycle Your Fridge